Watch the video. It's funny!
Grammatical Errors
It doesn’t cross my eyes any if you have a few instances
where you used double quotations when you should have used singles and vice
versa, or if you have the occasional homophone confusion. It happens, and they’re an easy enough
fix. However, if your manuscript is so
riddled with errors I’m starting to think you believe:
The exclamation mark is
the standard way to punctuate a sentence...
A rose is a flour and flower is what
you coat chicken with before you fry it...
That single quotations are the
standard for dialogue (unless you’re a British-English author. I know that’s one of the ways you do it
across the pond.)...
That it’s perfectly fine to do this!?!? or this!!!!...
That
it’s PERFECTLY FINE TO DO THIS...
And that you seem to have never cracked open a
dictionary to check for spelling or meaning...
I’m probably going to reject it. For example, literally. While the
dictionary does list a figurative meaning for the word now, it originally meant
something actually happened. So if your character says, “My head literally
exploded”, you’d better get a mop, because you have a mess to clean up. Ick. And if their head literally exploded, how are
we even discussing the matter with them?
Unless it’s from the POV of a dead character. And while that’s been done quite well, it’s a
very hard POV to pull off. The word has
been incorrectly used so much in daily language that even the dictionary has
been infected.
And yes, I’m guilty of
this. I talk like that. My head has
literally exploded. My heart has
literally stopped. I’ve literally been
scared to death. So how did I make this
post? I’m literally a ghost speaking to
you from beyond the grave, that’s how.
*grin* The word should actually
be figuratively.
My head
exploded, figuratively speaking.
But, since the dictionary now gives a figurative definition for literally, I suppose we’re stuck with it
and will just have to suck it up and move on.
*sigh* But there are other words
authors misuse because they think the words mean something else. It’s not uncommon, so I have no problem
telling the author I don’t think they want to use that word there. But when the author uses a lot of words
incorrectly, that’s when I wonder if they’ve ever checked the definitions. It’s easy to read a word in the context of
one sentence and get the wrong impression, but you don’t want to consistently
identify soup as gruel. They’re similar,
but not the same thing.
It’s easy to overlook a few of these instances, because the
mind glosses over things and sees what it wants to, like the difference between
reign and rein. But, if you have a lot
of these mistakes throughout the manuscript, you want to clear them up before
submitting. This is even worse if your
query and synopsis contain a lot of these errors.
One additional remark about extra punctuation and all caps
for emphasis. Sometimes you do see it in books published by one of
the Big Six, and that’s okay. One, the
“rules” of publishing change from time to time.
What was acceptable five years ago might not be acceptable now, and
what’s acceptable now might not be acceptable in five years. Two, it could also come down to the house
style guidelines and requirements of the individual publisher. If you really want to write,
“YOOOOUUUUUU!!!!!!”, I’m likely to suggest changing it to “Yoooouuuuuu!” because several houses tell you not to use all caps
for emphasis, and not to use multiple punctuation. You’re better off not doing it.
3 comments:
Ug! Homophones are what get me. When I'm typing fast the wrong spelling will often end up on the paper and then continue to slip through edits. It's like they don't register in my head. This is why paying an editor is SO important!
I once read a really bad book (one that clearly had no editor) where the author used "here" for what the ears do. Multiple times.
Homophones seem to be one of the most common errors.
Liz, that was actually another example that crossed my mind when I was writing the post, because I've seen the here/hear confusion quite a bit.
Post a Comment